Scott Johnston 890281

http://www.lightspeedaviation.com/content.cfm/Products/Zulu + 3.5mm adapter + cheap USB sound card.

Having all of those fixes displayed is pointless, just unnecessary clutter.

That's what they volunteered to do. Being paid or not is irrelevant.

Considering that you don't have the slightest clue what's going on in this division, I'd love to see you back up some comments with fact. I believe Kyle's comment equally applies here. I strongly encourage you to take a look around our VATUSA forums and website to see for yourself what we have been doing and what our plans are. There is a topic in the main forum titled "State of VATUSA", describing most of what we have been working on. How about you actually read what I wrote before trying to burn me.

I don't think that Bo or anyone else feel that VATSIM owes them anything. They just don't like to see it being sunk by incompetence and neglect.

So you're simulating bad QOL and low pay?

Haven't heard that one before. Now you see what happens when you make yourself the topic, bruh.

That's pretty slick, Gergely.

Not connected, but there wouldn't be any traffic anyway. This is my scope for GSO. http://www.piedmontaero.net/images/gso.jpg

Yes.

We don't need squawk codes on here either, why do we use them?

A favorite VATSIM pastime.

Delete the nHancer profile for FS9, and then make a new one.

Because it's a simulation. How is that difficult to understand? There are some things you can't simulate. If you can, you might as well do it.

All of the approaches into JAC and COD are fun. Not necessarily challenging, but the scenery is nice.