Jump to content

Timm Rehberg

Members
  • Content Count

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Timm Rehberg

  1. I will suggest the idea of "unsuccessful election" from the system to politics and Lotto here in Germany.
    Cool idea to prefer people who were unsuccessful last time for the next time to be honest. Means half of the slots next time are already "blocked".

    What so ever - I understand the fact that the number of pilots increasing is sadly not the same on the controller side but maybe thats also a point to VATSIM to allow easier ATC training or to change the region to become a ATC somewhere else?
    Restrictions for example to control a certain time in a region before you're able to move is kind of useless within a global network. 

    But this goes way too far now.
    Congrats to everyone with a slot 🙂 

    • Like 1
  2. 15 minutes ago, Andreas Fuchs said:

    Well, not everyone is able to connect to the CTP-website at a certain date and time to grab one of the slots before they are all gone within a few minutes. The old system was grossly unfair with the growing number of participants. And as we have learnt, the system remembers who was not lucky this time and will take this into consideration for the next edition of CTP.

    But this is a never ending unhappiness story here. Next time half of the people will not get a slot again....
    Why not making 2 slot-opening dates within a week to differrent times - so everybody can PLAN.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Andreas Fuchs said:

    There's no reason to complain. I did not get a slot. Did I complain? There are 363 other days of the year when you can "cross the pond".

    Thats not an argument. Cross the Pond is not just to Cross the Pond. Its all about the number of traffic and ATC which makes the event amazing and insane.
    The separation of opening bookings for certain routes was a cool idea. Maybe you could have separated these "events" another time to another day.

    You feel a bit like you "lost" a lottery rather than feeling "ok, I was too slow. Better luck next time" 😄 

    • Like 3
  4. Don´t cry?
    He just complained in a normal way. Calm down 🙂 
    The lottery system + no pos reports is the wrong way to change the behavior of getting a slot and manage CTP. Sad

    Anyway: Have fun everybody.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  5. Hi there!

    Could you update us if there will be a new update with all changed published until now (new airspace, etc.) and for example LTFM included in some time?

    Or is there any page where we can find minor updates to included for our vat-spy?

  6. Hi,

     

    is there any possible idea how we can change the fact that people use the real callsign but are offset to the real times/routes etc. ?

    I wanted to take a real flight today on VATSIM but the callsign was already in use as someone departed 2 hours earlier already (4 hours earlier than the real flight).

    It could be possible maybe with a range. Within a range of 500nm, the callsign only once.

     

    Or a bit more difficult:

    The login on vPilot with Callsign, Selcal and Registration. During the connection, a unique user-code gets created and linked to the callsign, registration and selcal + name and Vatsim ID. So the chat is only working with .msg VATSIM-ID TEXT because the login is only allowed once. And if a controller is clicking on the plane tag, it automatically uses the generated code to communicate instead of only the callsign.

     

    I don´t know if this is too complicated or futurism but it was a idea, even for the Model matching.

    If I login with D-ABYA that others vPilot is first looking for a D-ABYA in their libary and with a match, it shows the correct plane. If not - it takes another random one.

     

    VATSIM Vision 2.0

     

    Regards

  7. Note that if the atc_parking_codes and atc_model entries in the aircraft.cfg are correct, VMRGenerator is not needed. vPilot will find the models automatically.

    Good info! But I've just got the info that the package I was talking about is illegally collected from different AI developers so I deleted all links and so on.

  8. Hi Ross,

     

    sure - I am VERY in love with vPilot. Its a really simple pilot client with everything what you need. Thanks for this!

    But could you check if its possible to included a feature which was one of my favorite: To select for a online pilot a model on my choice!

     

    Its actually with v4 of P3D really annoing to have such a lot of Regional Jets flying around or to see a friend flying next to me with a AI model except with a PMDG model.

     

    I have no idea if its possible - requested by a lot but its my thought.

     

    Thanks

    Timm

  9. Hi guys,

     

    I've been using IVAO MTL for some years now but I heard that they are not compatible for v4 or maybe some of the models.

    So I would like to open this thread to get your opinions which AI tool/addon/package is the best actually to use for v4.

     

    I just spend a dollar for SPAI Traffic V6.3 but a lot of planes doesnt have correct or any AI model shown in P3D v4.

     

    Thanks a lot!

    Timm

  10. Aerosoft has announced that our recent CPDLC Topic Night has encouraged them to implement CPDLC into their upcoming A330. Sounds promising!

     

    Indeed, a very positive and nice message from their side! Which could also mean that they will update the A32x series as well.

    I really hope that PMDG is going to do this step as well as the "FMC page" is already clickable but not linked to a tool/software.

     

    Thanks for the news!

  11. Hi guys,

     

    as a user of the Aerosoft A320 (future A330), PMDG 777 and the PMDG 747, I am wondering why the companies do not implement a feature like CPDLC into the plane.

    Is there any restriction by the network? No Interface?

     

    Just think about all 777, 747 and A330 pilots have CPDLC available and using it. It could help everybody and increase the realism as well!

     

    Maybe someone can explain me this.

     

    Thanks a lot

    Timm

  12. An new update:

     

    ATC-TD => Christoph Piel [810816]

     

    Chief EVENT/PR => Daniel Raetzel [946945] is new Chief.

     

    Deputy EVENT/PR => Kai Bock [955925]

     

    EDWW Cief => Jörg Büsing [983922]

    EDWW Dep. Chief => Paul Holtkamp [841307]

     

    EDBB Chief => Marcus Wietholz [870778]

    EDBB Dep. Chief => Thorbjörn Schönbeck [881214]

     

    EDMM Chief => Rainer Brinkschulte [811970]

    EDMM Dep. Chief => Thorsten Zoerner [906808]

     

    EDFF Chief => Matthias Schmitz [905157]

    EDFF Dep. Chief => Kay Wesche [991619]

     

    EDLL Chief => Peter Herrman [887329]

    EDLL Dep. Chief => Christian Kisslinger [982245]

     

    LSAS unchanged

     

    LOVV Chief => Bernhard Harb [933889]

    LOVV Dep. Chief => Clemens Moritz [881890]

     

    Hope it is right.

    More can be view here: http://www.vacc-sag.org/?PAGE=staff

  13. Hi Ross,

     

    It's a pity that you don´t make a future programm as ServInfo.

    Because DLMN is also a great programm but it can not give the hand to servinfo,...

     

     

    Thx a lot!

  14. Ross,

    sorry for the a bit off-topic question but are you not able to creat a programm as ServInfo for the VATSIM and Ixxx Netzwerk-User?

     

    I think you are the best programmer here and...you made very very good tools for us all!

     

    Please give your best, use a much time and creat a new ServInfo Version with all features who´s actuall now.

    (Weather, Route [you can view the Route who is filed], ...)

     

     

    I think...you are the best man for it...and I think...the style must be a bit the same as ServInfo...

     

    Thx and have a nice evening!

     

    Best regarts,

    Timm Rehberg

  15. Good evening guys,

     

    I have a question.

    I will do ATC at DTMB and I´am am now controller of the SwissFIR of the VACC-SAG.

     

    I have to seen that are no activ controller for DTMB and my questions are:

    What must I do, that i can do DTMB_APP or other Monastir positions?

     

    Best regarts,

    Timm Rehberg

  16. Hello Michal Rok.

     

    First, you have made an very great and good program!

    So every programs after the release has some bugs. It´s not bad...

     

    Sorry for my english (15 years)

     

    a) zoom in the MAP-Mode? I don´t know

    b) The watherpicture isn´t perfect.. Wind direction, wind strength ....Forcast Monday?

    c) I can´t call the single FIR´s in Germany

    d) Route "Westerland/EDXW" - "Frankfurt/EDDF" are able but "Frankfurt/EDDF" - "Westerland/EDXW" are not able or in the flightplan system. ?!

    e) All routes from (exp.) EDDF/Frankfurt at one picture?!

     

    EDDF - xxx

     

    OMDB, EDDM, EDDH, LEPA, LEAL, GCRR?!

    f)the program is using only the default Internet Explorer (why?)

    g)The germany borders from VACC-SAG are not correct. In real but not for VATSIM.

    edfffb2.jpg

    Not correct...(in real is it right.. )

     

    h)the working memory are to high. At one PC is it 45MB and ServInfo are at this PC 15MB ?!

    i)is it able to have in a next version an fully metar request feature?!

    j)what route-database is that from vroute.info?

     

    Many points are from other user from the VACC-SAG Forum who has post some bugs.

     

    Sorry for my BAAADDD english.

     

    Regarts,

    Timm Rehberg

×
×
  • Create New...