Richard McDonald Woods Posted June 13, 2018 at 01:50 PM Posted June 13, 2018 at 01:50 PM @Ross, By far the majority of my flying hours in FIRs is without on duty en route controllers. With the implementation of CDPLC functions within GFO, there will still be long periods when CPDLC services will be unavailable. Could you consider developing functions that will provide an AI-based en route controller in FIRs where there is currently no real en route controller on duty I appreciate that we are in the very early stages of considering future VATSIM and PMDG GFO interfaces. Many thanks. Cheers, Richard You are the music, until the music stops. T.S.Eliot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Carlson Posted June 13, 2018 at 02:04 PM Posted June 13, 2018 at 02:04 PM Hi Richard, It's an interesting idea, but not something I have any interest in developing myself. Perhaps someone else would. Developer: vPilot, VRC, vSTARS, vERAM, VAT-Spy Senior Controller, Boston Virtual ARTCC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard McDonald Woods Posted June 13, 2018 at 02:09 PM Author Posted June 13, 2018 at 02:09 PM Hi Ross, I fully understand. Perhaps someone else will show an interest in plugging this otherwise huge hole I am willing to provide architectural support. Cheers, Richard You are the music, until the music stops. T.S.Eliot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie Queally 1394209 Posted June 15, 2018 at 09:50 AM Posted June 15, 2018 at 09:50 AM AI ATC couldn't be as realistic as VATSIM controllers are. How could it tell the difference between SID [Mod - Happy Thoughts]ignments at every airport? How could it differentiate between different procedures that come in nearly every country? Richie Queally Facility Engineer, CZVR [email protected] czvr.vatcan.ca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard McDonald Woods Posted June 15, 2018 at 10:20 AM Author Posted June 15, 2018 at 10:20 AM Hi Richie, I fully understand that not all pilot-initiated CPDLC messages are susceptible to meaningful AI replies Once Kyle at PMDG has defined the messages that are to be supported, we can decide which subset of these are suitable for the AI engine to reply to when there is no real FIR controller on duty. Thanks for your reply Cheers, Richard You are the music, until the music stops. T.S.Eliot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts