Jump to content

You're browsing the 2004-2023 VATSIM Forums archive. All content is preserved in a read-only fashion.
For the latest forum posts, please visit https://forum.vatsim.net.

Need to find something? Use the Google search below.

VAT-Spy

222 topics in this forum

  1. Servinfo logo

    • 1 reply
    • 1.7k views
  2. Servinfo and Win 7 64

    • 0 replies
    • 1.7k views
  3. my 2 cents on things servinfo could have had...

    • 1 reply
    • 1.5k views
  4. Voice servers

    • 2 replies
    • 1.9k views
  5. VATSIM-official ServInfo update 2010 - we need your data! 1 2

    • 45 replies
    • 14.7k views
  6. private voice servers with squawkbox?

    • 3 replies
    • 2.2k views
  7. how to get new company logo into flight plan info in map?

    • 2 replies
    • 1.6k views
  8. ServInfo Weather

    • 2 replies
    • 2.1k views
  9. ServInfo Base Pack + Chinese Airspace Update

    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
  10. Data over 1 hour old?

    • 4 replies
    • 2k views
  11. FIR.DAT format

    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
  12. First time connection to Vatsim

    • 1 reply
    • 2k views
  13. Missing Airport: CYTZ Toronto City Centre

    • 1 reply
    • 1.9k views
  14. VATSIM-official ServInfo update 2007 download 1 2 3 4

    • 75 replies
    • 47.3k views
  15. Aircratf showing up beside airfield in servinfo map??

    • 0 replies
    • 1.5k views
  16. Houston Radio (ZHU_FSS) not visible

    • 5 replies
    • 2.3k views
  17. UUDD-Domodedovo

    • 4 replies
    • 2.5k views
  18. cannot download servinfo

    • 5 replies
    • 4.1k views
  19. Problems downloading

    • 5 replies
    • 2.2k views
  20. Recognition of New Division

    • 11 replies
    • 3.2k views
  21. How to download server information

    • 1 reply
    • 2.7k views
  22. How to add fir to servinfo?

    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
  23. ServInfo Flight Type

    • 3 replies
    • 1.7k views
  24. Access Violation Error when installing ServInfo 2.02!!!

    • 1 reply
    • 1.4k views
  25. If Servinfo is working fine for you please read

    • 2 replies
    • 1.7k views