Jump to content

You're browsing the 2004-2023 VATSIM Forums archive. All content is preserved in a read-only fashion.
For the latest forum posts, please visit https://forum.vatsim.net.

Need to find something? Use the Google search below.

LUAW Effective Today (9/30/2010)


Andrew Doubleday
 Share

Recommended Posts

Daniel Hawton
Posted
Posted

@Bryan, LAUW wasn't implemented due to runway incursions... it was exclusively implemented to bring it in line with ICAO's phraseology.. and that's it. To me, that's not a valid reason to changing phraseology. I tend to operate under the concept of "If it isn't broken, don't fix it". Thanks NTSB and FAA, for changing something that wasn't broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert Shearman Jr
Posted
Posted

I understand the reasons posited, and I don't care. Because to me, "Line Up And Wait" is an instruction you give to a cl[Mod - Happy Thoughts]room full of five-year-olds, not to a licensed and certified pilot. That may or may not be a stupid reason to hate the new phraseology, but there it is, and you'll be hard-pressed to change my mind about it.

Cheers,
-R.

fvJfs7z.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryan Wollenberg 810243
Posted
Posted
@Bryan, LAUW wasn't implemented due to runway incursions... it was exclusively implemented to bring it in line with ICAO's phraseology.. and that's it.

 

Exactly! That's why it was so stupid to change it. I was just addressing some of the people who seem to think that "position and hold" was causing m[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion amongst foreign pilots. That wasn't the case at all.

Bryan Wollenberg

ZLA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ernesto Alvarez 818262
Posted
Posted

i prefer "hurry up and wait" myself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ross Carlson
Posted
Posted
The problem is that when the FAA switches to new procedures out of the blue, you just end up causing m[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion amongst our domestic pilots

 

Bryan, is LUAW actually causing m[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion among domestic pilots at your facility? (Are you a local controller? For some reason I thought you were enroute.) "M[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion" evokes some pretty scary imagery in my mind ... and I'm getting on a commercial jet tomorrow ...

 

It's hard for me to phrase this question without sounding like I'm challenging your [Mod - Happy Thoughts]ertion ... I'm really just having a hard time understanding the backlash this change has generated from r/w controllers. I'm not a real world controller so I lack the benefit of experience here. I am a real world pilot, though, and I just can't see how this is so confusing for anyone. And I fly rarely compared to commercial pilots. Seems like they'd get used to it very quickly.

Developer: vPilot, VRC, vSTARS, vERAM, VAT-Spy

Senior Controller, Boston Virtual ARTCC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ernesto Alvarez 818262
Posted
Posted

wasnt there as much debate when the US implemented RVSM? here we are a little over 5 years later and its just normal now.

 

if LUAW stays, itll be the norm soon too when everyones has had time to get used to it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jason Baxter 920557
Posted
Posted

Yes but RVSM increased efficiency and actually contributed to the system, it was not done just for the sake of it after having manipulated the darn thing in as many times in the previous 5 years.

 

Personally I don't care who came up with the good idea, it just has to be a good idea.

CS13_Sig_D.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryan Wollenberg 810243
Posted
Posted
Bryan, is LUAW actually causing m[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion among domestic pilots at your facility? (Are you a local controller? For some reason I thought you were enroute.) "M[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion" evokes some pretty scary imagery in my mind ... and I'm getting on a commercial jet tomorrow ...

 

Ha ha!! No, no, you're good to go Ross. I am enroute, so the change does nothing to me, but I have already heard stories. Daniel or one of the local guys can probably comment better, but I have been told that many of the commercial pilots, and almost all of the GA pilots failed to get the memo on the new phraseology. The GA pilots in particular have NO CLUE what the controllers are talking about.

 

In true FAA fashion, safety was never compromised. It wasn't a safety issue before the phraseology change, nor is it now. There are just pilots not understanding what it is the controllers want them to do, and as a result, there is actually a loss of efficiency taking place.

 

It will just take some getting used to on everyones' part. My issue is that there is nothing to be gained from the change. If there was an operational advantage, or increased safety, or whatever, I would be first in line to support the change, i.e. the RVSM example. However, literally nothing is gained from this change at all. Just seems senseless.

Bryan Wollenberg

ZLA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daniel Hawton
Posted
Posted

Many pilots didn't get the memo. My facility was fortunate enough that, being a military base, we can have training specifically to go over the new phraseology. Downside: the pilots started using the phraseology before us.. IE, "Buck 110, runway 7R, position and hold" "Line up and wait runway 7R, buck 110.".. some of them apparently didn't get the memo.. we told one guy today line up and wait and he sat lined up with the taxiway centerline at the hold short.

 

@Bryan, I agree. Nothing is gained. I see more lost than gained from this move. We have lost our "seemless" phraseology... "Continue, Traffic holding in position" after telling an aircraft to line up and wait. Uhh? Hold, wait, make up your mind!!

 

One can only hope that when the notice expires, it is not renewed or placed in the next change. *crosses fingers!*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ross Carlson
Posted
Posted
However, literally nothing is gained from this change at all.

 

I would argue that there is at least a small gain in understanding for non-US pilots flying into the US. Is that small gain worth the short-term minor loss of understanding for US pilots that didn't get the memo? Probably not ... but once everyone gets the memo, we'll all be on the same page, and I see that as a good thing. Again, this is just the opinion of a non-pro real-world pilot.

 

As an anecdote, I really like this change when it comes to VATSIM. More than once in the past I have had non-US pilots have no clue what to do when I say "position and hold." When I realize that they don't get it, or that they are interpreting it as "hold position", I issue "line up and wait" and they get it right away.

Developer: vPilot, VRC, vSTARS, vERAM, VAT-Spy

Senior Controller, Boston Virtual ARTCC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jason Baxter 920557
Posted
Posted

Poor them, I use taxi into position and hold and got the same result.

I even know some spanish since I control so close to Mexico and occasionally get non-english pilots.

CS13_Sig_D.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaron Essary 1140658
Posted
Posted
The problem is that when the FAA switches to new procedures out of the blue, you just end up causing m[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion amongst our domestic pilots

 

Bryan, is LUAW actually causing m[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion among domestic pilots at your facility? (Are you a local controller? For some reason I thought you were enroute.) "M[Mod - Happy Thoughts] confusion" evokes some pretty scary imagery in my mind ... and I'm getting on a commercial jet tomorrow ...

 

It's hard for me to phrase this question without sounding like I'm challenging your [Mod - Happy Thoughts]ertion ... I'm really just having a hard time understanding the backlash this change has generated from r/w controllers. I'm not a real world controller so I lack the benefit of experience here. I am a real world pilot, though, and I just can't see how this is so confusing for anyone. And I fly rarely compared to commercial pilots. Seems like they'd get used to it very quickly.

 

I am a real world pilot as well. Working on IFR rating at this time. I have gotten use to "line up and wait," but I still miss the "position and hold" phrase.

 

I feel the same way as Rob does (stated above).

Visit our Virtual Alliance and inquire today @ http://www.starallianceorg.webs.com

Commonly referred to as Wookierabbit on Flight Gear, Youtube, and etc.

TransGear controller for the Flight Gear network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aaron Essary 1140658
Posted
Posted

Ah shoot, I thought page 2 was the last page. ..........

Visit our Virtual Alliance and inquire today @ http://www.starallianceorg.webs.com

Commonly referred to as Wookierabbit on Flight Gear, Youtube, and etc.

TransGear controller for the Flight Gear network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stephen Faison 920525
Posted
Posted
Many pilots didn't get the memo.

 

I guess to help increase the awareness somewhat, at least at the airport I fly out of, they are broadcasting a 'notice' about it over the ATIS. If I remember correctly from a flight over the weekend it was something like, "...line up and wait phraseology now in effect for airports across the nation..."

 

Not sure how many airports are actually putting this in the ATIS though...

Stephen Faison

Senior Controller - C3

vZTL ARTCC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brad Littlejohn
Posted
Posted
Many pilots didn't get the memo.

 

I guess to help increase the awareness somewhat, at least at the airport I fly out of, they are broadcasting a 'notice' about it over the ATIS. If I remember correctly from a flight over the weekend it was something like, "...line up and wait phraseology now in effect for airports across the nation..."

 

Not sure how many airports are actually putting this in the ATIS though...

 

All of the majors that I've called or have contacts at the Tower. I'd expect it to be there for at least a month.

 

BL.

Brad Littlejohn

ZLA Senior Controller

27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ian Elchitz 810151
Posted
Posted

I don't see what all the hubub is about - you will simply get used to it as many others did.

Ian Elchitz

Just a guy without any fancy titles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harold Rutila 974112
Posted
Posted

I received plenty of notices about it. From AOPA to FAA Safety Brief e-mails to Flying Magazine's free e-mail subscription and posters in the FBO, if you're somewhat internet savvy, it's not that hard of a change to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share