Emiliano Ferraco 0 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 (edited) Hi, I have some doubts about COPX Take a look a this one: COPX:*:*:PADAS:*:*:EZE-RADAR:EZE-FIR:*:*:PADAS 1º.- Are coordinations points reciprocal? In the example, coordination points works fine much as for precedings planes from EZE-RADAR and from EZE-FIR? or should I define COP in both ways EZE-RADAR:EZE-FIR and EZE-FIR:EZE-RADAR? 2º.-Are FIR COP used for Firs boundaries between firs that belongs to the same country? or they are just used in an international boundary? 3º.- When a fix corresponds to both, a FIR_1 and a TMA_1 boundary, should I define a COP in that fix between FIR_1 and FIR_2 by [Mod - Happy Thoughts]igning it to the minor in hierarchy (the TMA)? Thnx Edited September 7, 2011 by Guest Emiliano T. Ferraco http://www.sur-air.com.ar http://www.estudioferraco.com.ar Link to post Share on other sites
Gergely Csernak 3 Posted August 12, 2011 Share Posted August 12, 2011 1 - In case you do not have point/rwy before and after the point itself (*:*:PADAS:*:*) then you do not have to repeat it. 2 - It is really up to you. FIR_COPX is an ordenary COPX point but displayed in another TAG item. There is no more functions that makes them different. 3 - If you do not have any additional constraint (climb, descend to the TMA_1 airport) and FIR_1 always owner of TMA_1 if no APP controller is online, then it is not necessary. Gergely. EuroScope developer Link to post Share on other sites
Emiliano Ferraco 0 Posted August 13, 2011 Author Share Posted August 13, 2011 thank you Gergely..! Emiliano T. Ferraco http://www.sur-air.com.ar http://www.estudioferraco.com.ar Link to post Share on other sites
Emiliano Ferraco 0 Posted September 5, 2011 Author Share Posted September 5, 2011 Hi, I´ve a new doubt now: If in a FIR COPX the LOA establishes that at a designed fix, to transfer the flight, it is require a minimun FL (for example FL250 as min), but not an specific FL, how can I define that COPX? Just guessing, perhaps I should define two FIR_COPX, one for the event the aircraft is below the min. (defining a climbing constraint) , and other in case the aircraft is above that min. (in this case, without any constraint)... Emiliano T. Ferraco http://www.sur-air.com.ar http://www.estudioferraco.com.ar Link to post Share on other sites
Emiliano Ferraco 0 Posted September 8, 2011 Author Share Posted September 8, 2011 Anyone? Emiliano T. Ferraco http://www.sur-air.com.ar http://www.estudioferraco.com.ar Link to post Share on other sites
Gergely Csernak 3 Posted September 18, 2011 Share Posted September 18, 2011 In COPX and FIR_COPX you can define only one altitude. That is used for profile calculation as a default coordinated altitude for transfer. There is no way to define minimum and maximum levels at a given point. Gergely. EuroScope developer Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now