Jump to content

You're browsing the 2004-2023 VATSIM Forums archive. All content is preserved in a read-only fashion.
For the latest forum posts, please visit https://forum.vatsim.net.

Need to find something? Use the Google search below.

A bit confused


Jim Allan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jim Allan
Posted
Posted

Good day. Yesterday (25 Jan 06), a friend of mine was doing a trans pacific originating in RJTG to somewhere in the USA. The controler on-line was listed on Serv-info as covering ocianic, however when my friend started giving position reports, the controler stated that he was Tokyo control and told the pilot that further position reports where not required.

I went to the Vat-Japan site, and tried to find out what was going on, but got further confused. The way I read it is that Tokyo control can be split into E and W sectors, neither of which extend much out to sea. Yet, I find no reference to Ocianic control. SI's map has RJTG extending out to 165 deg E. Considerably further out than just the islands.

My questions: is SI out to luch reference the way they draw the sectors for Japan? Was the controler on duty listed on the wrong ctr ID? Or does the web site need to be up-dated?

 

Thanks much!

Jim

atc1o.png

 

If you don't know the answer...at least make it sound convincing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Masafumi Teshiba 810826
Posted
Posted

Hi Jim

 

The SI shows Tokyo FIR, not Tokyo Control.

You can see the border between the airspace of Tokyo Control and oceanic here.

 

http://www.vatjpn.org/image/TokyoCTR.jpg

 

Basically, Tokyo Control isn't on duty in oceanic area, though it depends on the controller.

If the controller tells other to cover it, the callsign will be RJTG_V_FSS.

 

Regards,

Masafumi Teshiba

VATJPN1

Masafumi Teshiba

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share