patrick MOUQUET 1251779 Posted July 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM Posted July 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM (edited) (...) Edited November 2, 2014 at 08:37 PM by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duarte Folgado 1106197 Posted July 7, 2014 at 10:54 PM Posted July 7, 2014 at 10:54 PM Hi Patrick, I'm not a controller on Madrid airspace as I control in the neighbor country - Portugal. I made couple of routes in last month for an event between LFBO and LPPR that flew under Spanish FRA and I think I noticed the very same behavior. Can you just put an example of one entire route that you're getting troubles? Duarte Duarte Folgado Instructor (I1) & Certified Pilot (P4) Lisboa FIR Director (ACCPT3) Portugal vACC -VATEUD - VATSIM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick MOUQUET 1251779 Posted July 8, 2014 at 06:29 PM Author Posted July 8, 2014 at 06:29 PM (edited) (...) Edited November 2, 2014 at 08:37 PM by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duarte Folgado 1106197 Posted July 9, 2014 at 10:01 AM Posted July 9, 2014 at 10:01 AM Hello Patrick, I took a few time reproducing your routes and examples and here it goes what I found: I used the very same route and did only change the ACFT type and EQPT code to "my standard" ones. The first route was accepted with success both in PFPX and in the eurofpl.eu: http://puu.sh/a3qDD/fdaa1235e4.png However, the second route is a complete different story as I experience the very same error that you do: http://puu.sh/a3rh8/eba15a329c.png So, actually it's complaining that the segment is too long but it says that maximum is 0nm witch does not make any sense. I do agree on you that according to the DCT pdf docomeent KORAV DCT KORUL should be available as per LE5117 ID. I really don't know if can be a small bug on the system (witch can be difficult) or it's something behind of that, but as I control in a different airspace I really don't know if there are some extra specific SOPs apart from RAD DCT. I hope that helps you in someway knowing at least you're not the only one experiencing the issue Duarte Duarte Folgado Instructor (I1) & Certified Pilot (P4) Lisboa FIR Director (ACCPT3) Portugal vACC -VATEUD - VATSIM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick MOUQUET 1251779 Posted July 9, 2014 at 06:44 PM Author Posted July 9, 2014 at 06:44 PM (edited) (...) Edited November 2, 2014 at 08:37 PM by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duarte Folgado 1106197 Posted July 10, 2014 at 11:00 AM Posted July 10, 2014 at 11:00 AM Exactly as mine yesterday. I checked the timeline availability of the segment and since it's H24 should be not a factor. Maybe CFMU folks are reading our discussion and solving their issues Duarte Duarte Folgado Instructor (I1) & Certified Pilot (P4) Lisboa FIR Director (ACCPT3) Portugal vACC -VATEUD - VATSIM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Tyndall 1087023 Posted July 10, 2014 at 11:15 PM Posted July 10, 2014 at 11:15 PM Hate to sound ignorant, but I confess I am. Is "FRASAI" a concept, a procedure, a six character waypoint....what? I have been following this thread trying to get more knowledgeable about European procedures, but this one has me stumped. Randy Randy Tyndall - KBOI ZLA I-11/vACC Portugal P4 “A ship is always safe in the harbor. But that’s not why they build ships” --Michael Bevington ID 814931, Former VATSIM Board of Governors Vice President of Pilot Training Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastien Bartosz Posted July 11, 2014 at 02:56 AM Posted July 11, 2014 at 02:56 AM Free Route Airspace Santiago and Asturias New York ARTCC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Fuchs Posted July 11, 2014 at 08:58 AM Posted July 11, 2014 at 08:58 AM It may well be that there was a bug in the CFMU validation-software and that they have fixed it by now. It is also worth trying weekend days if a route does not work on a normal business-day. I had some trouble there as well last month, because as a Route Administrator at VATroute I have quite a few routes to South America that are crossing exactly this airspace. In the end I could solve those problems, luckily. Cheers, Andreas Member of VATSIM GermanyMy real flying on InstagramMy Twitch streams of VATSIM flights and ATC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Tyndall 1087023 Posted July 11, 2014 at 12:52 PM Posted July 11, 2014 at 12:52 PM Thank you Sebastien, now for some reading on my part... Randy Randy Tyndall - KBOI ZLA I-11/vACC Portugal P4 “A ship is always safe in the harbor. But that’s not why they build ships” --Michael Bevington ID 814931, Former VATSIM Board of Governors Vice President of Pilot Training Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duarte Folgado 1106197 Posted July 11, 2014 at 01:50 PM Posted July 11, 2014 at 01:50 PM Hi Randy, In a very general way FRA allows operators to plan a more flexible DCT. For example in Portugal in a very short way you have something like this: I. Overflight traffic should plan directly from FRA airspace entry point to FRA airspace exit point; II. Arriving traffic should plan directly from FRA airspace entry point to the STAR initial waypoint; III. Departing traffic should plan directly from SID final waypoint to the FRA airspace exit point. More info here: https://www.eurocontrol.int/news/free-route-airspace-deployed-europe (A little old but helps explaining the advantages and current status in Europe). Duarte Duarte Folgado Instructor (I1) & Certified Pilot (P4) Lisboa FIR Director (ACCPT3) Portugal vACC -VATEUD - VATSIM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts