Dante Nikolovski 1262085 Posted July 12, 2015 at 02:56 PM Posted July 12, 2015 at 02:56 PM Here, airway UL608 within LWSS is between DISOR and LONTA. The tag is set up to show the FIR exit point. I see only DISOR, which is not the FIR exit point (in this case is LONTA). Also, UL608, I see only DISOR point, no sign of LONTA. In the SCT file, it is defined "UL608 DISOR DISOR LONTA LONTA" . Please help, Thanks Dante Nikolovski Training Director at MACvACC VATEUD Divisional Instructor [email protected] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Loxbo Posted July 12, 2015 at 07:20 PM Posted July 12, 2015 at 07:20 PM It looks like DISOR is correct in the situation displayed in the image, as the aircraft is not yet in your sector so the COPN (entry coordination point) would be displayed instead of the COPX (exit coordination point). At least this would be logical but I suppose the tag could be set up differently. That the route prediction is lacking LONTA could be because the Airways.txt file is not loaded, or that UL608 via LONTA is not in the Airways.txt file. The airways in the SCT are used for display only and are not used for the route calculations. Martin Loxbo Director Sweden FIR VATSIM Scandinavia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Nikolovski 1262085 Posted July 14, 2015 at 01:22 AM Author Posted July 14, 2015 at 01:22 AM It looks like DISOR is correct in the situation displayed in the image, as the aircraft is not yet in your sector so the COPN (entry coordination point) would be displayed instead of the COPX (exit coordination point). At least this would be logical but I suppose the tag could be set up differently. That the route prediction is lacking LONTA could be because the Airways.txt file is not loaded, or that UL608 via LONTA is not in the Airways.txt file. The airways in the SCT are used for display only and are not used for the route calculations. I checked the Airways.txt file, and there is LONTA defined. And in the TAG there is FIR exit point, but not showing it. I changed it to "exit sector point name" and shows it right, but I am not sure if it will show it to every aircraft. How should I change it? Thanks. Dante Nikolovski Training Director at MACvACC VATEUD Divisional Instructor [email protected] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Nikolovski 1262085 Posted July 14, 2015 at 09:03 PM Author Posted July 14, 2015 at 09:03 PM Same thing for UN132, in AIRWAYS.txt is defined MAVAR BITLA, but it shows MAVAR TALAS. What might be the problem? where is the bug? Dante Nikolovski Training Director at MACvACC VATEUD Divisional Instructor [email protected] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Christie Posted July 17, 2015 at 04:17 AM Posted July 17, 2015 at 04:17 AM What cycle is the airways.txt file? Kirk Christie - VATPAC C3 VATPAC Undercover ATC Agent Worldflight Perth 737-800 Crew Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonas Kuster Posted July 18, 2015 at 12:14 PM Posted July 18, 2015 at 12:14 PM What does ES calculate as route? Can you show once an opened flight plan for such an aircraft to see how ES is determining the route? Jonas Kuster Network Supervisor Leader Operation vACC Switzerland | vacc.ch @vaccswitzerland GNG Support Team | gng.aero-nav.com ES Plugin Developer | CCAMS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Loxbo Posted July 19, 2015 at 03:42 PM Posted July 19, 2015 at 03:42 PM Still sounds to me like your Airways.txt file might not be used for the calculation. Make sure the file is loaded correctly. Martin Loxbo Director Sweden FIR VATSIM Scandinavia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Nikolovski 1262085 Posted July 19, 2015 at 06:34 PM Author Posted July 19, 2015 at 06:34 PM I loaded it 20 times, the txt file in FSnavigator, Airways.txt . And it is the latest cycle. I don't know ....maybe it is the sector file, but what kind of role does it play in all that? And, for the TAG, I don't know it is the sector file. I am sure it is some kind of bug in Euroscope. If it says FIR exit point name, it should show it to me all the time. If the FIR is only one sector, then same goes for Sector exit point name. I've tried it with other sector files and it is same thing. Dante Nikolovski Training Director at MACvACC VATEUD Divisional Instructor [email protected] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Christie Posted July 19, 2015 at 11:31 PM Posted July 19, 2015 at 11:31 PM I've found loading airways.txt via euroscope to be problematic, instead I just replace it in docomeents/euroscope Kirk Christie - VATPAC C3 VATPAC Undercover ATC Agent Worldflight Perth 737-800 Crew Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morten Jelle Posted July 20, 2015 at 04:43 PM Posted July 20, 2015 at 04:43 PM When updating the airways.txt, you can choose it within Euroscope. After you have selected the airways.txt, restart Euroscope, and it should load it correctly. For the tag, as your airways.txt isn't updated correctly, it will not show the EXIT point, as there is not EXIT point, that Euroscope can show from the flightplan, because Euroscope can't find the airway after DISOR - so that part makes sense. So try to load the airways.txt and restart Euroscope. It should help - at least is does to me. Morten Jelle VATSIM Network Supervisor, Team Lead - Supervisor Team 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts