Jump to content

You're browsing the 2004-2023 VATSIM Forums archive. All content is preserved in a read-only fashion.
For the latest forum posts, please visit https://forum.vatsim.net.

Need to find something? Use the Google search below.

[ES 3.2 stable] Error in Station resolution (red line)


Daniel Rechberger
 Share

Recommended Posts

Daniel Rechberger
Posted
Posted

Hey there!

A collegue in our vACC has come across a problem of the ES 3.2 stable version:

 

yKs8aPw.jpg

 

As it is visible, there is no red line for Hungary (airspace, where RYR is in)

 

But in the ESE-File used are following ESE-Sectors defined:

 

(relevant austrian sectors):

SECTOR:LOVV·LOWW-APP-B·000·245:00000:24500
OWNER:WR:VL:VC
BORDER:164:165:166:128:156:155:154:153:167:168
DEPAPT:LOWW:LOAN:LOAV
ARRAPT:LOWW:LOAN:LOAV

SECTOR:LOVV·LOWW-APP-P·000·245:00000:24500
OWNER:WP:WR:VL:VC
BORDER:174:175:168:171
DEPAPT:LOWW
ARRAPT:LOWW

 

every LHCC-Sector which is not a FIC/FIS sector:

 


SECTOR:LHCC·WL·195·245:19500:24500
OWNER:BC:BEC
BORDER:189:7:190:211:212:210:206:61:118:127:166:165:164:182:70:3:181

SECTOR:LHCC·WL/L·095·195:09500:19500
OWNER:BC:BEC
BORDER:189:7:190:209:210:206:61:118:127:166:165:164:182:70:3:181

SECTOR:LHCC·WL/M·245·345:24500:34500
OWNER:BC:BEC:EE
BORDER:176:213:180:189:7:190:211:212:210:206:61:118:127:166:165:214:175:215

SECTOR:LHCC·WT·345·660:34500:66000
OWNER:BC:BW:BEC:EE
BORDER:176:213:180:189:7:190:211:212:210:206:61:118:127:166:165:214:175:215

 

As you might see, the common subset are {164, 165, 166, 175 } in terms of BORDER-Lines

 

So there is a bug!

 

SCT & ESE File: http://files.aero-nav.com/LOVV

 

Please advise,

 

Daniel Rechberger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonas Kuster
Posted
Posted

Daniel,

 

red lines at common borders are not "just" shown. They have to be defined (further down in the sector file) explicitely. If they aren't, you should advise the sector file originator. GNG (which is now used by Austria) provides some automatism in this matter, but it's linked to clear conditions. If they are not met, no automatic red line will be shown.

It works perfectly on the sector files I take care of. I didn't observe any anomalies.

Jonas Kuster
Network Supervisor
Leader Operation vACC Switzerland | vacc.ch @vaccswitzerland
GNG Support Team | gng.aero-nav.com
ES Plugin Developer | CCAMS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daniel Rechberger
Posted
Posted

ok - our designated sectorfile-maker is checking it out - thread may be closed ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share