Daniel Rechberger 0 Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 Hey there! A collegue in our vACC has come across a problem of the ES 3.2 stable version: As it is visible, there is no red line for Hungary (airspace, where RYR is in) But in the ESE-File used are following ESE-Sectors defined: (relevant austrian sectors): SECTOR:LOVV·LOWW-APP-B·000·245:00000:24500 OWNER:WR:VL:VC BORDER:164:165:166:128:156:155:154:153:167:168 DEPAPT:LOWW:LOAN:LOAV ARRAPT:LOWW:LOAN:LOAV SECTOR:LOVV·LOWW-APP-P·000·245:00000:24500 OWNER:WP:WR:VL:VC BORDER:174:175:168:171 DEPAPT:LOWW ARRAPT:LOWW every LHCC-Sector which is not a FIC/FIS sector: SECTOR:LHCC·WL·195·245:19500:24500 OWNER:BC:BEC BORDER:189:7:190:211:212:210:206:61:118:127:166:165:164:182:70:3:181 SECTOR:LHCC·WL/L·095·195:09500:19500 OWNER:BC:BEC BORDER:189:7:190:209:210:206:61:118:127:166:165:164:182:70:3:181 SECTOR:LHCC·WL/M·245·345:24500:34500 OWNER:BC:BEC:EE BORDER:176:213:180:189:7:190:211:212:210:206:61:118:127:166:165:214:175:215 SECTOR:LHCC·WT·345·660:34500:66000 OWNER:BC:BW:BEC:EE BORDER:176:213:180:189:7:190:211:212:210:206:61:118:127:166:165:214:175:215 As you might see, the common subset are {164, 165, 166, 175 } in terms of BORDER-Lines So there is a bug! SCT & ESE File: http://files.aero-nav.com/LOVV Please advise, Daniel Rechberger Link to post Share on other sites
Jonas Kuster 4 Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 Daniel, red lines at common borders are not "just" shown. They have to be defined (further down in the sector file) explicitely. If they aren't, you should advise the sector file originator. GNG (which is now used by Austria) provides some automatism in this matter, but it's linked to clear conditions. If they are not met, no automatic red line will be shown. It works perfectly on the sector files I take care of. I didn't observe any anomalies. Jonas Kuster Leader Operation - vACC Switzerland | www.vacc.ch Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Rechberger 0 Posted December 19, 2017 Author Share Posted December 19, 2017 ok - our designated sectorfile-maker is checking it out - thread may be closed ... Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now