Jacob Fordham 966986 Posted September 25, 2006 at 07:46 PM Posted September 25, 2006 at 07:46 PM I'm thinking of making a few flights (maybe in Concorde!) over to the USA and would like to know the main differences regarding ATC phraseology, procedures et cetera that as an English virtual pilot I shall have to keep in mind "across the pond". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Smith Posted September 25, 2006 at 08:41 PM Posted September 25, 2006 at 08:41 PM Line up and wait --> Postion and Hold Circuits -> Closed Traffic QNH (millibars) -> altimeter (inches of mercury) (1013mb = 29.92") Variable transition levels -> FL180 transition level Other notes: SIDs and STARs apply to multiple rwys, and are not named by their transitions. They are available for every airport in the US right here: http://www.myairplane.com under the Approach Plates section SIDs and STARs should be included in your flight plan, by name. Do not just say "SID xxx yyy STAR". Example, SFO-LAX would be "PORTE3.AVE.SADDE6" not "SID AVE STAR" Do not request startup/shutdown approval. Do not request pushback. You can be cleared to land if you are not #1 for the runway. That is, you might hear "traffic on 2 mile final is a 737, winds 280 at 5, rwy 25R, number 2, cleared to land" Other than that, my experience has been that it's about the same. Come on over and give it a try! I normally fly/control in the USA, but have recently done a little flying over in Europe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travis Faudree 821145 Posted September 25, 2006 at 09:34 PM Posted September 25, 2006 at 09:34 PM Do not request startup/shutdown approval. Do not request pushback. Not always the case. Take RDU for example, Terminal A departures most often push into or near taxiway Alpha. If you are going to push back into a movement area (some place under the jurisdiction of a ground controller; ie. somewhere other than the ramp area) you must request the push. Also, if for some reason you need to shut down the engines in a movement area, you must request it. Knowing when to request push is pretty easy if you just evaluate what area of the airport you will push back into. Come on over and give it a try! Agreed. We often have foreign pilots visit us in ZDC and I always enjoy it. Those that do venture over here from across the pond have usually done their homework and are very easy to work with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Turner Posted September 26, 2006 at 05:08 AM Posted September 26, 2006 at 05:08 AM Do not request startup/shutdown approval. Do not request pushback. Not always the case. Take RDU for example, Terminal A departures most often push into or near taxiway Alpha. If you are going to push back into a movement area (some place under the jurisdiction of a ground controller; ie. somewhere other than the ramp area) you must request the push. Also, if for some reason you need to shut down the engines in a movement area, you must request it. Knowing when to request push is pretty easy if you just evaluate what area of the airport you will push back into. Come on over and give it a try! Agreed. We often have foreign pilots visit us in ZDC and I always enjoy it. Those that do venture over here from across the pond have usually done their homework and are very easy to work with. Keith I believe is talking about VATSIM life, not real life... We don't require pilots to call for push and fire usually unless it's a major event and there is something like gate holds in effect, etc... Jeff "JU" Turner US Army Retired http://www.skyblueradio.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Smith Posted September 26, 2006 at 05:58 AM Posted September 26, 2006 at 05:58 AM Travis, you're correct. I was speaking in general terms an didn't address that relatively rare exception. I mentioned it only because I noticed a pattern in Europe on VATSM, practically every single pilot called for startup/shutdown approval at every airport I visited. Generally speaking, such permission is not required here in the US (except for the case you describe, and even then, I'm not sure how many controllers recognize that case). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradley Podd 856945 Posted September 26, 2006 at 08:41 AM Posted September 26, 2006 at 08:41 AM (Just for fun...) "BAW123, type 733/J, Stand 87, information Mike, request clearance to Manchester." ---> "AAL123, instruments to Vegas." "Taxi to stand 12 via Bravo, cross runway 16/34, Foxtrot1, Link1, call for shutdown" ---> "Taxi to parking" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob Fordham 966986 Posted September 26, 2006 at 04:34 PM Author Posted September 26, 2006 at 04:34 PM Thankyou! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Johns Posted September 26, 2006 at 04:47 PM Posted September 26, 2006 at 04:47 PM When calling for clearance here in the US, I would suggest using the following example as a guide. Reference the Aeronautical Information Manual, which is, among other things, a pilot's guide to ATC in the US. It is located online at www.faa.gov/atpubs if you are interested. 5-2-4. Abbreviated IFR Departure Clearance (Cleared. . .as Filed) Procedures . . . h. To ensure success of the program, pilots should: 1. Avoid making changes to a filed flight plan just prior to departure. 2. State the following information in the initial call-up to the facility when no change has been made to the filed flight plan: Aircraft call sign, location, type operation (IFR) and the name of the airport (or fix) to which you expect clearance. EXAMPLE- "Washington clearance delivery (or ground control if appropriate) American Seventy Six at gate one, IFR Los Angeles." 3. If the flight plan has been changed, state the change and request a full route clearance. EXAMPLE- "Washington clearance delivery, American Seventy Six at gate one. IFR San Francisco. My flight plan route has been amended (or destination changed). Request full route clearance." Abbreviated departure clearances are (I would think) probably 99% of the clearances given to the normal IFR departure here in the States. I second everything Keith has said up top too. Oh... and single digit runway numbers are not preceeded with a zero I remember my first flight in Europe a few years back. I admit I was kind of scared, but aside from some phraseology differences, and maybe the occasional accent that was hard to understand, I had a successful flight. It was definitely an eye opener to see how ATC works in other parts of the world! ~Nate Nate Johns "All things are difficult before they are easy." - Dr. Thomas Fuller, Gnomologia, 1732 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Kan Posted September 26, 2006 at 10:57 PM Posted September 26, 2006 at 10:57 PM Guess you probably will be taking the Concorde tracks, once you enter New York Oceanic, and if a controller is online, we simulate a radar enviroment because of the almost new invention the real world has called ATOPS. So it might start before you even see land. Like my GOAT? Too bad, it's mine. My airline flying at the speed of normal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob Fordham 966986 Posted September 27, 2006 at 07:51 PM Author Posted September 27, 2006 at 07:51 PM Alright. So that means I won't have to make pos reports then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Horan 901577 Posted September 27, 2006 at 08:21 PM Posted September 27, 2006 at 08:21 PM Alright. So that means I won't have to make pos reports then? You will have to once you enter Gander Oceanic Matt www.vatsim.net/prc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Kan Posted September 27, 2006 at 10:52 PM Posted September 27, 2006 at 10:52 PM yes but not as long, just basically "p[Mod - Happy Thoughts]ing ABCDE" Like my GOAT? Too bad, it's mine. My airline flying at the speed of normal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob Fordham 966986 Posted September 28, 2006 at 04:33 PM Author Posted September 28, 2006 at 04:33 PM Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Anopov 895164 Posted October 2, 2006 at 11:02 AM Posted October 2, 2006 at 11:02 AM The difference between FAA and JAA regulations ARE MAJOR, not just phraseology, but every aspect of flying and ground preparations procedures as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Blocki 933043 Posted October 10, 2006 at 02:08 AM Posted October 10, 2006 at 02:08 AM Another small difference is that in the US we say "Contact Miami Center 1-3-2 POINT 2 - 5" In Europe you hear, "Contact XXX Approach 1-2-3 DECIMAL 4" Peter Blocki Deputy Air Traffic Manager Miami ARTCC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rey Lopez 883899 Posted October 13, 2006 at 05:03 AM Posted October 13, 2006 at 05:03 AM yes but not as long, just basically "p[Mod - Happy Thoughts]ing ABCDE" i swear the other day i heard zny getting those long pos reports and everytime i listen same with gander but im not so sure ill have to listen tomorrow and see The thoughts and/or words or any general things that are expressed above are not a direct reflection of the views of the actual poster myself, Rey Lopez, and should be disregarded and left unread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Horan 901577 Posted October 13, 2006 at 12:35 PM Posted October 13, 2006 at 12:35 PM yes but not as long, just basically "p[Mod - Happy Thoughts]ing ABCDE" i swear the other day i heard zny getting those long pos reports and everytime i listen same with gander but im not so sure ill have to listen tomorrow and see If you're listening to the HF stream on liveatc.net, I'm sure you'll hear Gander, Shanwick and NY on there from time to time, so it might have been a position report meant for those north of 45N.. check here, you'll see what I mean Matt www.vatsim.net/prc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts