Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The altitude between the fixes are the lowest safe altitude for that section.

The altitude at the fix is a requirement of the STAR to cross that fix at or above 270.

If you are told to descend via the STAR you would plan to cross ABASN at or above 270. If the controller canceled the level requirements of the STAR you could descend below 270 ABASN but not below the 200 on that section.

 

Kirk Christie - VATPAC C3

VATPAC Undercover ATC Agent

Worldflight Perth 737-800 Crew Member

956763

Link to post
Share on other sites

As above, pilots refer to the altitudes/flight level on a STAR with a line above, below, or both.
For 'descend via' clearance, cross ABASN at/abv FL270
Other altitudes (the min route altitudes on a segment of the SSKII arrival) are not relevant for a 'descend via' clearance,
 

.... as a side note for US airspace, questions have been raised by rw pilots and re-visited by the FAA.
The criteria for determining an MEA on an en-route chart may not be the same as a minimum route altitude for a segment published on a STAR.
- MEA (Minimum Enroute IFR Altitude) 'lowest published altitude between radio fixes that ensures acceptable navigational signal coverage and meets obstacle clearance requirements between those fixes'.
- On a STAR (or SID), minimum route altitudes for a segment may have been "artificially raised to support ATC separation needs/traffic management".
(pilot may reference in the event of an aircraft emergency + radio failure/ lost comms ... additional in two links above.)

In case useful ...
- Aeronautical Chart User's Guide (pages 119, 123)
- Aeronautical Information Manual (check 5-4-1,
Standard Terminal Arrival (STAR) Procedures; "descend via" examples)

legend.jpg

Edited by Mike Sweeney
  • Like 1

Mike / 811317
rz0u.png
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...