James Pimenta Posted February 20, 2021 at 05:26 PM Posted February 20, 2021 at 05:26 PM (edited) I noticed at Manchester UK (EGCC) I have to ask the controller for start-up and push back clearance. I know this can be found in the Navigraph Airport Briefing (DEP) and is also said in the real world. I know this is obvious for Passenger Airliners/Large Aircraft, but surely for smaller aircraft that do not require push back, can they simply get away with just asking for a start-up request? or am talking rubbish? Edited February 20, 2021 at 06:58 PM by James Pimenta spelling mistake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koen Meier Posted February 20, 2021 at 05:33 PM Posted February 20, 2021 at 05:33 PM if you are parked at an stand that uses a straightout taxi system you just request startup clearance. however do listen to ATC what they clear you for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tobias Dammers Posted February 28, 2021 at 03:43 PM Posted February 28, 2021 at 03:43 PM Took a quick look at the parking / docking chart, but there doesn't seem to be any stand from which you could do a taxi-out, they're all nose-in, except for the GA/Business aprons, which don't have any precisely designated parking areas. The airport briefing says this on the matter of taxi-out / power-back: Quote Aircraft will not be permitted to reverse off pier-served stands under their own power. Aircraft may be permitted to reverse off remote stands at the discretion of the aerodrome authority. Permission must be obtained from the Airfield Duty Manager (Ext. 3331) via ATC prior to manoeuvre. (Source: https://www.aurora.nats.co.uk/htmlAIP/Publications/2021-01-28-AIRAC/html/eAIP/EG-AD-2.EGCC-en-GB.html#AD-2.EGCC) I don't know how it's normally done at EGCC, but I would expect that if you're on a regular stand, you would normally be cleared for pushback, unless you are at a remote stand (like those North of taxiway Z) and explicitly request a power-back. GA aprons are often "push/taxi at pilot's discretion", not controlled, so you would request startup, and be advised to hold short and report somewhere on the boundary of GND's area of responsibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koen Meier Posted February 28, 2021 at 03:54 PM Posted February 28, 2021 at 03:54 PM powerback would only be viable on a prop aircraft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tobias Dammers Posted February 28, 2021 at 04:06 PM Posted February 28, 2021 at 04:06 PM Yes, and we are talking about "smaller aircraft that don't require push-back" here, so that seems appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Fuchs Posted March 2, 2021 at 03:18 PM Posted March 2, 2021 at 03:18 PM (edited) On 2/28/2021 at 4:54 PM, Koen Meier said: powerback would only be viable on a prop aircraft. I have been onboard a 727 that did a power-back in Miami. Good old days! Edited March 2, 2021 at 03:19 PM by Andreas Fuchs Cheers, Andreas Member of VATSIM GermanyMy real flying on InstagramMy Twitch streams of VATSIM flights and ATC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott D. Williams Posted April 3, 2021 at 01:59 PM Posted April 3, 2021 at 01:59 PM Power back was standard for NWA DC9 and MD80 in the US at certain airports. It always makes me cringe a little because it seemed so prone to FOD and burned a little more fuel of course.. Scott D. Williams KMEM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts