Jump to content

You're browsing the 2004-2023 VATSIM Forums archive. All content is preserved in a read-only fashion.
For the latest forum posts, please visit https://forum.vatsim.net.

Need to find something? Use the Google search below.

8.02 Activity Requirements for Minor Fields


Alexandra Robison
 Share

Recommended Posts

Thimo Koolen
Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Matthew Bartels said:

The concern that many on the BoG have around this process is that in a hobby network such as ours, life takes priority when it happens.

Man, do I love this sentence. If only it was applicable to some other things in the GCAP requiring a strict deadline (from training staff).

  • Like 2

spacer.png

ACCNL4 (Training Director) - Dutch VACC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Alexandra Robison

    19

  • Matthew Bartels

    17

  • 1341101

    14

  • Joshua Borges

    11

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Alexandra Robison

    Alexandra Robison 19 posts

  • Matthew Bartels

    Matthew Bartels 17 posts

  • 1341101

    1341101 14 posts

  • Joshua Borges

    Joshua Borges 11 posts

Popular Days

  • Jul 21 2021

    108 posts

  • Jul 22 2021

    15 posts

  • Jul 25 2021

    7 posts

  • Jul 24 2021

    7 posts

Popular Posts

Alexandra Robison

Be honest, when was the last time someone tried to set an activity policy that had to be intervened by the BoG? Most ARTCC policies have to go through Division approval, and no Division would allow th

Alexandra Robison

Here's a crazy idea. Remove the policy from GCAP altogether and let each subdivision create their own activity policy as they see fit. If a controller is unhappy with an activity policy at a particula

Karl Mathias Moberg

Huh, cool! Give me a minute, and I'll connect as SY_APP or CTR, since no SUP will remove me, we'll see how that goes. As for the rest of the statement: I'm sorry, but I completely disagree and I

 Share