James Hudson 951027 Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:27 PM Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:27 PM Hi, heard the new rules, just one question. If there is a working guard channel on VATSIM how come it is restricted in the US. I know some pilots that fly as real as possible and in some parts of a checklist it says announce on Guard 121.5. I can also understand that maybe some people will OVER use it. But why not just take it off vatsim? NY T R A C O N A R T C C. JFK ISP LGA EWR PHL... NY Instructor I1 ZNY Lead Event Coordinator Braniff International Virtual Airways CEO braniffva.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Horan 901577 Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:28 PM Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:28 PM Who said it's just the US? I believe VATSIM has a policy on it themselves.. Matt www.vatsim.net/prc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Stjepanovic 963114 Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:34 PM Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:34 PM It's available in the whole world! I've noticed it quite a number genuine transmissions made over it. Controllers have feelings too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Elchitz 810151 Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:37 PM Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:37 PM James, I believe the intent of the policy with respect to atc and guard channel usage is primarily aimed at controllers. As I understand it, VATUSA has limited authority over pilots flying in their airspace. AFAIK there is no restriction for pilots using the guard frequency to simulate an emergency scenario. Ian Elchitz Just a guy without any fancy titles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Beach 915973 Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:48 PM Posted April 11, 2007 at 10:48 PM Pilots should not carry on private conversations between themselves or controllers on the active communication frequency or on the "guard" frequency (121.50). This interferes with providing ATC services to other pilots. The guard frequency should only be utilized in cases of emergency and under no other circomestances. Vatsim.net Code of Conduct, Pilot Regulations, section Six Controllers should not carry on private conversations between themselves, pilots or other individuals on the active communication frequency, the ATC channel or on the “guard†Brian Beach VatsimPHP Developer: http://www.bbflights.com/VatsimPHP/ AFA Detroit Hub Director: http://www.flyafa.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Temple 880167 Posted April 12, 2007 at 12:07 AM Posted April 12, 2007 at 12:07 AM Referring to the Guard 121.5 not the ATC Channel used by controllers. I have never seen it used, and am also under the impression that it is forbidden period. Just my understanding, if someone can give me a past example on how it was legally used, I'd love to hear it to get a better baseline on the situtation. Any pilot that ever had an emergency in the airspace I was controlling, just called me up on my frequency. Matthew Temple Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Ogrodowski 876322 Posted April 12, 2007 at 12:17 AM Posted April 12, 2007 at 12:17 AM The Global Guard frequency is 121.500, but is never usually used. Incidentally, the GUARD channel is text-based, like UNICOM. The UNICOM channel exists for inter-pilot communications, and limited use of the Guard channel is sometimes permissible. The Guard channel transmits to both ATC and pilots no matter what frequency anyone else is tuned to, within a range around you...which is why it is generally considered disruptive. The other option available, in case conflict resolution is necessary, is the .WALLOP command, which sends a message to Supervisors (in case intervention is needed). In reality, the Guard channel is not truly necessary...but it is there. In my four and a half years here...I have seen the Guard used in the U.S. once (I believe the person called a MAYDAY...dunno where), and really haven't seen a situation that warranted its use...but it tends to be pretty dull here in the Midwest Steve Ogrodowski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strad 827369 Posted April 12, 2007 at 02:25 AM Posted April 12, 2007 at 02:25 AM I've been here since 2001 and have not seen Guard ever used by pilots or controllers Ryan Strad ZOA - Senior Controller ATC-CTI Student Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Gauthier 895085 Posted April 12, 2007 at 05:15 AM Posted April 12, 2007 at 05:15 AM I've been here since 2001 and have not seen Guard ever used by pilots or controllers I'm not that much of an old-timer, but since 2004, I've also never seen it used, nor can I think of a valid use for it. $mypvtrw() $radio() {Name/Rank Not Allowed...See ServInfo and try not to crash} {METAR Not allowed...Crash while checking Servinfo} {No Other Info available...Excuse: No Bandwidth} Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Moulton Posted April 12, 2007 at 03:29 PM Posted April 12, 2007 at 03:29 PM I can remember it being used (the guard channel) by controllers announcing that they were open/closed. I suspect that this was the primary reason it was banned. It may not have happened within VATSIM itself, but may have been something that happened in SATCO and was a carry over rule. Fly Safe! Have Fun! Craig Moulton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Brummett Posted April 12, 2007 at 10:43 PM Posted April 12, 2007 at 10:43 PM I can remember it being used (the guard channel) by controllers announcing that they were open/closed. I suspect that this was the primary reason it was banned. It may not have happened within VATSIM itself, but may have been something that happened in SATCO and was a carry over rule. It happened in SATCO quite often (I started in 1998), the reason being our membership was so low, it was essentially to announce we were online. We also did not have Servinfo, so it was tough to tell who was online unless you actually connected. Mark Brummett Website owner, http://www.zkcartcc.org ZKC Events Co-ordinator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts