Jump to content

Voice Atis Metar decode problem


Recommended Posts

Since day one I have created my own voice set (which is used in Hvacc) for the voice metar. This voice set is based on the wavs that come with the programm plus some addition at the airport names.

 

Today I come across the following problem. The current LGAV metar is

 

LGAV 081350Z 34003KT 9999 FEW018TCU BKN025 BKN080 11/08 Q1004 WS 03L RMK WS LDG RWY03L

 

Using the decoder of the Vacchun

 

http://vacchun.hu/td/esmetar.php?tlcond=100,1013,105&metar=$metar($atisairport)&arr=$arrrwy($atisairport)&dep=$deprwy($atisairport)&app=ILS&par=1&info=$atiscode&lvp=2

 

 

I am getting teh following output

 

[LGAVinfo]Y[observation at]1350[iLS][03R][departure rwy][03L][attention][ws][transition level]105[wind]340[degrees]3[knots][visibility][more than 10 kms][RWY03L][clouds][FEW]{1800}[feet][TCU][bKN]{2500}[feet][bKN]{8000}[feet][temperature]11[dewpoint]8[degrees C][QNH]1004[hpa][firstcontact]Y

 

 

The problem on the above is the bolt entry. Why is there? Since I have not recorder such a wav the voice ATIS is failing. Did it read the Remark or something else?? Any Ideas?

810670

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bold entry is included in the METAR just before the RMKs section so it gets included in the voice ATIS (although in a different spot). Not being familiar with European METARs I'm not sure why it's included. You can just delete the [RWY03L] entry in the decoded ATIS and things should work.

Danny Burtch

CZYZ Senior Student

2635.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Few hours later the METAR was like this

 

LGAV 081350Z 34003KT 9999 FEW018TCU BKN025 BKN080 11/08 Q1004 WS 03L

 

Which was recognised correctly from the ATIS on the ES and the voice ATIS was played correctly. Is there a possibility the section after the remarks not to be read by the interpretor?

810670

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx Attila...

 

 

I would give it a try and will report back if any probelms are found.

 

One other think that was reported by another user (although I believe this was a METAR error) was when clouds are reported at 999. Yesterday it was reported SCT999 which translates to 99900 feet, ofcourse this wav does not exist and I beleive does not have to since this is something not correct

810670

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...