Chris Makris Posted December 29, 2009 at 06:58 AM Posted December 29, 2009 at 06:58 AM Hello, First of all congrats for the new release On VRC I had made a sct2 sector file for the ground of LGAV, now that ES supports this kind of sector I copy pasted the relevant parts to the ES sector file. What I observed is that for some reason ES reads the colours different than VRC. What I mean. On the Regions insdide the sct2 I had Black XXXXX Cordinates XXXXX Cordinates XXXXX Cordinates XXXXX Cordinates GREY XXXXX Cordinates XXXXX Cordinates XXXXX Cordinates XXXXX Cordinates DGREY XXXXX Cordinates XXXXX Cordinates XXXXX Cordinates In that way the first colour, black, was on top of Grey etc, ie the first colour definition had the top priority. With ES now it is opposite the last declared colour has the top priority. On the example above the sector file was DGREY since that was the last colour that I had declared. The solution was to reverse completly the order of colours. Is there any reason for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gergely Csernak Posted December 29, 2009 at 07:49 AM Posted December 29, 2009 at 07:49 AM Chris, It was an issue in the beta as well. Originally the display order of the region elements was the opposite they appeared in the SCT2 file. I received a suggestion that it should not be in this way as VRC displays them in the straight order. So I changed. Now the regions are put to the screen on the same order as they are in the SCT2 file. Gergely. EuroScope developer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross Bristo 1010003 Posted December 29, 2009 at 11:30 PM Posted December 29, 2009 at 11:30 PM Hi, I have been putting the regions i created in sector files in to my ES files, however, In the regions area of the display settings, i have a check box for one called "Un-named". Which, when i turn it on, is what i copied in. My question is, how do you name different regions? I tried putting a name after the coordinates but that does not work either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oliver Gruetzmann Posted December 30, 2009 at 12:06 AM Posted December 30, 2009 at 12:06 AM REGIONNAME name Runway N049.42.11.254 E011.56.12.728 ;Runway 14/32 N049.41.44.722 E011.56.43.062 ; N049.41.45.143 E011.56.43.967 ; N049.42.11.706 E011.56.13.632 ; Building N049.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Webb 1097731 Posted February 19, 2010 at 02:41 AM Posted February 19, 2010 at 02:41 AM Do you have to re-specify the REGIONNAME name when changing the colors? For example: REGIONNAME Madison gray N043.09.02.261 W089.19.44.289 N043.08.00.026 W089.20.31.305 N043.07.59.238 W089.20.29.459 N043.09.01.473 W089.19.42.436 ;- TARMAC SOUTH RAMP REGIONNAME Madison darkgray N043.07.58.448 W089.19.34.031 N043.08.03.998 W089.19.33.959 N043.08.09.801 W089.19.41.283 N043.08.10.906 W089.19.44.868 N043.08.11.062 W089.19.56.961 N043.08.09.791 W089.20.00.383 When I do this, it puts it under the correct name. If I omit the second REGIONNAME section it will be in a "no name" section in display settings. -Rich Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gergely Csernak Posted February 19, 2010 at 07:25 AM Posted February 19, 2010 at 07:25 AM Affirmative. Every region should have its own name. Otherwise treated as noname region. Gergely. EuroScope developer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts