Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Yes, I know, this is not the first time this annoying problem came up here.

 

Yesterday, after a couple of weeks I decided to do some controlling again.

And again in a session of 2,5 hours I had 3 pilots that didn't respond to my "contact me" calls for more then 30 minutes. I control in one of the busyest crossroads but very small airspace in Europe. You can easy cross my airspace from east to west in 30 minutes.

Yesterday I called a SUP on the third case because my airspace became very busy an I had to divert 4 planes to avoid one that was not answering for about 10 minutes now. He was about 30 miles in my airspace.

The SUP told me that he would take care of it but didn't. After another 25min the plane was out of my airspace.

I can understand that you leave the cockpit on a long flight over the ocean or on flights at night (local) in an airspace that is big enough so the controller can easy keep other traffic clear of you but not in the middle of the most busy time in the most busy airspace of Europe.

This problem is annoying me more than ever. And it is not only once, it's every time I am online.

Why is it not possible for a Sup to take the experience and decision of the local controller into account? He can see that I'm a C3 and I have a lot of online time. By the time I call him I have a good reason and tried everything I could to solve the problem myself.

 

Another thing that I see more and more is that pilots who are under control just tell you "leaving for 5 minutes" instead of asking if it is possible. They then return after 20 min. Most of the time I had already coordinated with the next controller and tryed to keep other traffic clear.

 

I'm not even gone start about the "problem" of the more and more text pilot's those days....

 

I saw someone saying in an other topic to first check Vatspy to see what kind of pilot are about to fly in your airspace.... Good idea but sadly not gone work always.

 

If Vatsim isn't going to make some changes to the rules, I think they gone loose a lot of good controllers.

 

Erik

spacer.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

A SUP will use their judgement to determine how long a pilot will get once entering controlled airspace. Depending on circomestances, it could be very little time or it could be all the way up to 30 minutes. As to why we can't just disconnect them because you ask us to, there are many controllers who do just call us and say disconnect this person. We can't just do that. It doesn't matter if you are an S1, C3, or I3. We need physical proof of wrong doing and we can't just take someone's word on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Erik,

 

adding to Nicholas' answer, I would like to say that you could have enquired with the SUP in question why he did not take care of the pilot that you had reported. He probably got carried away by other cases, which can easily happen. If you do not get a satisfactory result or answer, you should report this to the VP SUP, he has an open door to all sorts of feedback, be it good or bad. Us SUPs are individuals and everyone has a slightly different approach to things, some are more experienced, some are less. We strive to improve our service to the community, but for this we require your feedback. The best is by direct contact to the VP SUP instead of using the public forums.

 

Regarding your case: if a SUP does NOT disconnect an unresponsive pilot, then the main reason is that the ATCO has had not been online for more 30 minutes or more. We are to allow pilots 30 minutes away when outside active airspace and the worst case scenario is them leaving their computers exactly 1 minute before entering active airspace or 1 minute before an ATCO connects. We therefore normally check for how long the ATCO had been online in this situation and then adjust the "allowance" to 10, 15, 20 minutes or whatever is appropriate. E.g. you were connected for 10 minutes as ATCO, we should allow the pilot 20 minutes, because he could not know that you were online.

In your case, though, it sounded like you had been there much longer than 30 minutes already, so there is no reason to give the pilot more than 2 or 3 minutes before closing his connection.

 

By the way, pilots being unresponsive does not always mean that they are not at their computers. I regularly come along unresponsive pilots using XSquawkbox or vpilot, having inappropriate message alerting settings on their computers. When texting them I do not get a reply for many minutes. When I then tell them that I suspect that they are not aware of the incoming messages and I am going to disconnect them to raise their attention. It normally does not take more than a minute or two, before they connect to VATSIM again and apologize, they had not seen the chat messages.

 

The thing about pilots just announcing that they are leaving for a certain number of minutes, I sometimes just deny it. When they are close to the border of my airspace, I ask them to wait x minutes before handoff to the adjacent controller or UNICOM. And if they really need to go, I issue specific instructions to be back "before time xxxx" or "before waypoint ABCDE". That works for me in 95% of cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

This theorie can work in a large airspace. We have a very small piece of airspace in the middle of Europe. Pilot's can cross this airspace east-west in 30min and north-south in 10min. We have to sort out arrivals for 4 very busy neighbouring TMA's and out 5 local airports. If two unresponsive pilot's flying trough, it can be unpossible. Not only for us controllers but also for other pilot's.

So in theorie we can better stop controlling because every pilot can cross our airpsace without calling us just because they can cross in less then 30min.

 

The best is by direct contact to the VP SUP instead of using the public forums.

It's not just one case. I see this problem occure more and more and I don't think that telling one guy is gone solve the problem.

 

By the way, pilots being unresponsive does not always mean that they are not at their computers. I regularly come along unresponsive pilots using XSquawkbox or vpilot, having inappropriate message alerting settings on their computers. When texting them I do not get a reply for many minutes. When I then tell them that I suspect that they are not aware of the incoming messages and I am going to disconnect them to raise their attention. It normally does not take more than a minute or two, before they connect to VATSIM again and apologize, they had not seen the chat messages.

Why fly online if you don't expect messages. Stay in your cockpit while flying in rush hour in very busy airspace. Use voice!!

 

The thing about pilots just announcing that they are leaving for a certain number of minutes, I sometimes just deny it. When they are close to the border of my airspace, I ask them to wait x minutes before handoff to the adjacent controller or UNICOM. And if they really need to go, I issue specific instructions to be back "before time xxxx" or "before waypoint ABCDE". That works for me in 95% of cases.

I do that too but most of the time when you call them to handoff to the next controller you can't reach them because they left anyway.

 

Thanks for responding,

 

Erik

spacer.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
The thing about pilots just announcing that they are leaving for a certain number of minutes, I sometimes just deny it. When they are close to the border of my airspace, I ask them to wait x minutes before handoff to the adjacent controller or UNICOM. And if they really need to go, I issue specific instructions to be back "before time xxxx" or "before waypoint ABCDE". That works for me in 95% of cases.

This is fantastic advice. Working a predominantly "overflight" airspace as I often do, I've taken to treating requests for time off the deck with exactly this attitude. Each request now falls under one of about four categories:

 

  1. Non-critical ("Approved as requested, report back");
  2. Non-critical exiting my airspace ("Approved as requested, if not back within X minutes, frequency change approved");
  3. Time-critical in my airspace ("Time XXXXz, report back not later than YYYYz"). In such cases, I usually adjust the report back time to a few minutes short of when I actually need them back on frequency just to be safe; or
  4. Time-critical entering another controller's airspace ("Unable at this time. Make your request with the next sector. I'll have you over to him in X minutes"). I usually reserve this for pilots less than 10 flying minutes from an adjacent sector

Dhruv Kalra

VATUSA ZMP ATM | Instructor | VATSIM Network Supervisor

878508.png878508.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Erik,

This theorie can work in a large airspace. We have a very small piece of airspace in the middle of Europe. Pilot's can cross this airspace east-west in 30min and north-south in 10min. We have to sort out arrivals for 4 very busy neighbouring TMA's and out 5 local airports. If two unresponsive pilot's flying trough, it can be unpossible. Not only for us controllers but also for other pilot's.

So in theorie we can better stop controlling because every pilot can cross our airpsace without calling us just because they can cross in less then 30min.

why does this not work? If you, the ATCO, has not been online for more than 30 minutes, I can disconnect the pilot in question after a brief (2 or 3 minutes) chance to "wake up". If the ATCO has been there for less than 30 minutes, then we need to respect pilots who follow VATSIM's rules: 30 minutes away are acceptable if no ATC is expected to be there. When I fly online and I check for ATC ahead and there is nobody, I will be away for up to 30 minutes, if I need to. That is 100% okay!

 

The best is by direct contact to the VP SUP instead of using the public forums.

It's not just one case. I see this problem occure more and more and I don't think that telling one guy is gone solve the problem.

And why is it better to mention it here on the public forums? If you want to reach the one guy who can give specific instructions/feedback to Supervisors, then you need to contact the VP SUPs.

 

By the way, pilots being unresponsive does not always mean that they are not at their computers. I regularly come along unresponsive pilots using XSquawkbox or vpilot, having inappropriate message alerting settings on their computers. When texting them I do not get a reply for many minutes. When I then tell them that I suspect that they are not aware of the incoming messages and I am going to disconnect them to raise their attention. It normally does not take more than a minute or two, before they connect to VATSIM again and apologize, they had not seen the chat messages.

Why fly online if you don't expect messages. Stay in your cockpit while flying in rush hour in very busy airspace. Use voice!!

Maybe I was not clear enough: those pilots ARE at their computer, they ARE paying attention, but somehow there is no alert-sound for an incoming private message (which is the case for our requests to "contact me"), there is no pop-up window with the chat-message etc.. How on earth are they supposed to see that someone is trying to make contact with them? Normally it is beginners who are new to VATSIM and new to the specific pilot-client and have to get their grips on how to set it up correctly. There is no mal-intent, no leniency, no ignorance, just people who are new and who need to learn. Disconnecting them normally makes them have a look at their pilot-client and realize what is going on. They then know what to look for and what to change in their setups. Problem solved. You cannot blame them for anything.

 

The thing about pilots just announcing that they are leaving for a certain number of minutes, I sometimes just deny it. When they are close to the border of my airspace, I ask them to wait x minutes before handoff to the adjacent controller or UNICOM. And if they really need to go, I issue specific instructions to be back "before time xxxx" or "before waypoint ABCDE". That works for me in 95% of cases.

I do that too but most of the time when you call them to handoff to the next controller you can't reach them because they left anyway.

Then you must be really unlucky. When I control EDGG_E_CTR, EURI_FSS or EURM_CTR I rarely get this (I can count these cases on one hand, per year). In 95% of cases I can rely on the statements of pilots, they are often back well before the time that they requested. And if they do not return, get a SUP involved so they can "yell" at them and take care of the case. People staying away for much longer than agreed need to realize that this is not the way it is supposed to be.

 

In closing I would like to emphasize that we should strive to not allow those cases bother us too much. I try to concentrate on the good guys who know their navigation, their radio comms, their descent-planning etc.. Otherwise I'd get crazy as well, we have too many negative things in the real world already, let's try to chill here a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

Yes, I know, this is not the first time this annoying problem came up here.

 

Yesterday, after a couple of weeks I decided to do some controlling again.

And again in a session of 2,5 hours I had 3 pilots that didn't respond to my "contact me" calls for more then 30 minutes. I control in one of the busyest crossroads but very small airspace in Europe. You can easy cross my airspace from east to west in 30 minutes.

Yesterday I called a SUP on the third case because my airspace became very busy an I had to divert 4 planes to avoid one that was not answering for about 10 minutes now. He was about 30 miles in my airspace.

The SUP told me that he would take care of it but didn't. After another 25min the plane was out of my airspace.

I can understand that you leave the cockpit on a long flight over the ocean or on flights at night (local) in an airspace that is big enough so the controller can easy keep other traffic clear of you but not in the middle of the most busy time in the most busy airspace of Europe.

This problem is annoying me more than ever. And it is not only once, it's every time I am online.

Why is it not possible for a Sup to take the experience and decision of the local controller into account? He can see that I'm a C3 and I have a lot of online time. By the time I call him I have a good reason and tried everything I could to solve the problem myself.

 

Another thing that I see more and more is that pilots who are under control just tell you "leaving for 5 minutes" instead of asking if it is possible. They then return after 20 min. Most of the time I had already coordinated with the next controller and tryed to keep other traffic clear.

 

I'm not even gone start about the "problem" of the more and more text pilot's those days....

 

I saw someone saying in an other topic to first check Vatspy to see what kind of pilot are about to fly in your airspace.... Good idea but sadly not gone work always.

 

If Vatsim isn't going to make some changes to the rules, I think they gone loose a lot of good controllers.

 

Erik

 

Erik, I commend you for highlighting this but saddly(not surprisingly) nothing will be done.

 

The replys to your concern are the typical ones where you're made feel that there is nothing wrong and it is all in your head. Your concern will get sweapt under the carpet, this thread will eventually vanish into the page numbers and life will continue.

 

I suggest you record(if possible) your sessions making and archive for yourself with recorded timestamps of incidents you feel are a concern. Then once you've gathered enough material you feel will validate your point then bring it to the attention of the 'higher ups'.

 

I currently stream(record) my sessions noting incidents as they happen for future reference.

 

Unfortunelty for you with no evidence to back you up on your point it is a game of he said she said and you will alsways lose.

 

In closing I would like to emphasize that we should strive to not allow those cases bother us too much. I try to concentrate on the good guys who know their navigation, their radio comms, their descent-planning etc.. Otherwise I'd get crazy as well, we have too many negative things in the real world already, let's try to chill here a bit.

 

This for me empahsises the whole 'nothing to see here, please move along, go about your business' mentallilty some have on this network.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Johnny,

 

you are not right with your opinion. Whenever members highlight incidents, concerns or opinions towards the VP SUP, they get taken seriously and something will happen, if something needs to be done and can be done.

 

What Erik has described looked like a mistake by the SUP who was involved. My guess is that the SUP was working on several cases at a time (which happens regularly) and got distracted by a "more important" incident. I can comfortably stand here and say that this has happened to me more than once before, mistakes happen. They do not happen on purpose.

 

So, nothing will be swept away. Nothing will be hidden. They only thing that I wanted to show was how VATSIM's rules for unattended connections work "live on the network". We need to be fair to both sides, the ATCOs and to our pilots. In the case described by Erik, the SUP should have disconnected the other unresponsive pilot within a few minutes, but it did not happen by mistake. This should be followed up to make him aware of it so he can improve. Case closed. There is no systematic short-coming in the system itself. And if you now reply that we should not allow anyone to step away at all for more than 5 minutes, then we can close VATSIM down, it will not work, it will not be respected and we will be busy closing connections. This cannot be in anyone's interest.

 

If I have an unresponsive pilot and cannot get hold of him in good time, I treat him as being non-existent and tell other pilots to ignore him, even if they get a bit closer to him than would be comfortable. In the end we just push bits and bytes, only attitudes can get hurt.

 

Please don't be so pessimistic about VATSIM! It is a great community after all, there are so many positive things that outweigh the negative experiences. If, of course, you allow yourself to be dragged down and get angered over those unresponsive pilots, it may obstruct your view on the greater, more important parts. This is my personal opinion and attitude, nothing that you need to do, I am just offering my advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andreas,

 

What Erik has described looked like a mistake by the SUP who was involved. My guess is that the SUP was working on several cases at a time (which happens regularly) and got distracted by a "more important" incident. I can comfortably stand here and say that this has happened to me more than once before, mistakes happen. They do not happen on purpose.

I think you missed the point here. I don't point a finger to the SUP at all!

I wanted to point out that the problem with pilot's that are not responding is increasing bigtime.

I don't get it why you want to fly online and at the same time leave your PC for more then 5min. If you don't have the time to fly, don't fly online.

 

there is no pop-up window with the chat-message etc..

If this is true, I can only say that this software is not a good one and must not be used anymore.

How can you interact if you don't know if you receiving messages? Isn't that the whole point of flying online? pilot - controller interaction?

 

Erik

Edited by Guest

spacer.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I get these calls one of my first interests is any upcoming conflicts. If yes, then we get to disconnecting them expeditiously and I then send them an email explaining why I disconnected them but then unable to ensure they got that message and understood it. If not then I have time to wait to see if they came back because more than anything I want to talk to them to explain why they need to stay in the cockpit.

Kyle Ramsey

 

0

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kyle,

 

So, at this point you as a SUP decide when there is an upcoming conflict in an airspace you don't know? In my opinion there is more than just the upcoming conflict visible on your display. The local controller has a whole picture of the situation and knows the LOA's with the neighboring acc's and has a whole planning in his head for the climbs and descents of other traffic.

 

Just to be clear, I'm only started this topic because it's a problem that I encounter every time when controlling and not only yesterday. Most of the time I leave those pilot's just fly there route and try to divert other traffic around. Only when It's the thirth or foured in 2 hours time and I have the time to explane the problem (again) to a SUP I call them in.

 

Just hoping that pilot's read this too and let them feel how annoying this is.

 

Erik

spacer.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I ask the controller if there is any upcoming conflicts, and let them know to let me know if one arises. I mention this as it may explain what the SUP is doing for the next 30 min while it seems they are not doing anything.

 

I do not feel all that tied to the 30 min rule myself, as there is nothing in CoC that says they must be given 30 min for anything. I am interested in talking to them to try to correct the behavior for the future.

 

Unattended connections is the #1 reason for suspensions on our network. SUPs spend a lot of their duty time dealing with them. I doubt any of them are reading this thread and those that are may not see themselves as part of this problem.

Kyle Ramsey

 

0

Link to post
Share on other sites
we need to respect pilots who follow VATSIM's rules:

Such as CoC B3, which not only says "at all times" should pilots be checking for ATC but that they should "immediately" make contact when they observe one or one asks them to make contact? It says nothing about "... except ignore both of those phrases if you want to take a 30 minute break" even though nothing in the CoC or CoR guarantees you at least 30 minutes of inactivity?

 

When I fly online and I check for ATC ahead and there is nobody, I will be away for up to 30 minutes, if I need to. That is 100% okay!

It's also 100% okay for you to be disconnected and ([Mod - Happy Thoughts]uming repeats) "maybe suspended" for doing that. (Source)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it is not okay to get booted within the 30 minutes. The 30-minute-rule isn't there for nothing. Before leaving your computer unattended for a few minutes one has to check if there is ATC ahead and limit the time away based on this, so the 30 minutes may not be available in all situations. But that's it. Brad, please don't tell us SUPs how to do our jobs, you don't seem to know system well enough.

 

On a longer flight I need to eat. And if I need to eat, I will be in my kitchen to prepare fresh food as I never consume junk-food from the freezer or similar, as some here may be doing. Making a nice salad will take more than just 5 minutes...

Link to post
Share on other sites
No Johnny,

 

you are not right with your opinion. Whenever members highlight incidents, concerns or opinions towards the VP SUP, they get taken seriously and something will happen, if something needs to be done and can be done.

 

What Erik has described looked like a mistake by the SUP who was involved. My guess is that the SUP was working on several cases at a time (which happens regularly) and got distracted by a "more important" incident. I can comfortably stand here and say that this has happened to me more than once before, mistakes happen. They do not happen on purpose.

 

So, nothing will be swept away. Nothing will be hidden. They only thing that I wanted to show was how VATSIM's rules for unattended connections work "live on the network". We need to be fair to both sides, the ATCOs and to our pilots. In the case described by Erik, the SUP should have disconnected the other unresponsive pilot within a few minutes, but it did not happen by mistake. This should be followed up to make him aware of it so he can improve. Case closed. There is no systematic short-coming in the system itself. And if you now reply that we should not allow anyone to step away at all for more than 5 minutes, then we can close VATSIM down, it will not work, it will not be respected and we will be busy closing connections. This cannot be in anyone's interest.

 

If I have an unresponsive pilot and cannot get hold of him in good time, I treat him as being non-existent and tell other pilots to ignore him, even if they get a bit closer to him than would be comfortable. In the end we just push bits and bytes, only attitudes can get hurt.

 

Please don't be so pessimistic about VATSIM! It is a great community after all, there are so many positive things that outweigh the negative experiences. If, of course, you allow yourself to be dragged down and get angered over those unresponsive pilots, it may obstruct your view on the greater, more important parts. This is my personal opinion and attitude, nothing that you need to do, I am just offering my advice.

 

Please don't confuse pessimism with concern, I've been an active vatsim member since 2003, If I'd allowed stuff like this to 'drag me down' I'd have been gone a long time ago(many have).

 

As I said Andreas, I record all my sessions now, cataloging and timestamping incidents for future references and may even create an informative video showing my 'concerns' because without showing actual evidence, text on a forum post expressing concerns means nothing to some people.

 

think you missed the point here. I don't point a finger to the SUP at all!

I wanted to point out that the problem with pilot's that are not responding is increasing bigtime.

I don't get it why you want to fly online and at the same time leave your PC for more then 5min. If you don't have the time to fly, don't fly online.

 

This is exactly what I took from reading Erik's post, his concern and frustration of what he feels is an increasing problem and so responded as such backing him up because others feel the same but it seems you took it as a personal attack on the SUP team and went in excuse mode without actually addressing his concern.

 

Regarding your case: if a SUP does NOT disconnect an unresponsive pilot, then the main reason is that the ATCO has had not been online for more 30 minutes or more. We are to allow pilots 30 minutes away when outside active airspace and the worst case scenario is them leaving their computers exactly 1 minute before entering active airspace or 1 minute before an ATCO connects.

 

The 30-minute-rule isn't there for nothing.

 

This is in contradiction to this....

 

as there is nothing in CoC that says they must be given 30 min for anything. I am interested in talking to them to try to correct the behavior for the future.

 

So which is it Andreas?.

 

No, it is not okay to get booted within the 30 minutes. The 30-minute-rule isn't there for nothing. Before leaving your computer unattended for a few minutes one has to check if there is ATC ahead and limit the time away based on this, so the 30 minutes may not be available in all situations. But that's it. Brad, please don't tell us SUPs how to do our jobs, you don't seem to know system well enough.

 

Why are you attacking Bradley's response?, he linked two valid points?, did you read then and if so why is he wrong?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can never understand that if a pilot leaves the flight deck with no ATC, why they don't crank up their speakers if they are still in the house so that they can hear a controller calling them that might have popped up in the interim, or if they are getting dinged with either a "contact me" message or private chat. Seems to me a common sense approach in this regard, albeit amongst some pilots common sense isn't. And please don't say that not everyone has external speakers. They can certainly mute the engine noise but still keep an ear open through their pilot client.

Ken Bambach

ZMA ATM

VATSIM Supervisor

 

4.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can appreciate the OP's frustration, even though I am not a VATSIM controller, merely a pilot. Although the point made by someone else later on about "training pilots" seems valid enough, for the moment I will only be discussing his sole concern in post number one, unresponsive pilots.

 

I had 3 pilots that didn't respond to my "contact me" calls for more then 30 minutes

 

I'm sure there are statistics about this somewhere, perhaps not global stats, but at least regional ones, but I suspect in the real world some air traffic controller somewhere in the world has to deal with a NORDO aircraft every day. Does that controller say "that's it, I'm through"? No. True, he or she is being paid and our VATSIM controllers are volunteers and I get that, I really do. But what does that real world controller dealing with a NORDO aircraft do? He keeps all the other aircraft in the air away from it. He keeps them safe. That's his or her priority at the moment. His or her day just went from "pushing tin" to "controlling"!

 

I know as a pilot I have no problem with unresponsive or non-texting pilots when in uncontrolled airspace. I just have to be on my toes and watching out for me...and them. In controlled airspace I know that if the controller wants me to make an immediate turn to 180 degrees for traffic or spacing, then I'm certainly gonna do it. Just made another "Ho-Hum. watch the waypoints slowly move to the bottom of the ND" day into one with a little bit more than usual pilotage. Wanna have me hold while you try to get the NORDO guy up on the frequency? Cool, I haven't practiced a hold in a while, this could be fun! Wanna bring in that 13-year old kid screaming "Mayday, mayday, this is Air Force One demanding priority arrival for total engine flameout in all seven engines..."? Do it and space me in behind him so I can watch the fun when he lands way short and bounces back up in the air.

 

A controller on VATSIM, I would think, would relish the thought of doing more than merely handing aircraft off to, receiving aircraft from, clearing for takeoff, cleared to land, taxi via bravo, readback correct, etc, etc. That's what you do every day. Instead of 7 guys and girls crossing your airspace and not making any input to either aircraft or scope you now have four that are counting on you to make sure they don't collide with the three NORDO ones. Your controlling session just got interesting...and so did the flight for the 4 people you now have to care for!

 

When I fly for one of the VAs I belong to I fly their schedule, their route, but when I fly online for myself I don't look for CAVOK. I want dirty, nasty, windy, no vis, crosswind, watch out for the mountains on three sides flying. I want my flight to be interesting. Don't you want your controlling session to be interesting...or merely "ho-hum"?

 

I don't get it? I know the code, I know the rules, but sheesh, turn the lemon some NORDO guy just handed you into lemonade. If you don't like lemonade, then "sell" the lemonade in a stand that you create by being someone who is controlling, not just "pushing tin".

 

But, as I said at the beginning, I'm not a controller so I can't really offer an "experienced" post here.

 

Now, having said all that, being NORDO on VATSIM is not allowed. I'm not condoning it and I know it is a problem, but I'm all about this hobby too and I like my hobbies to be fun and until the powers that be figure out how to lessen or eliminate the problem...I'm gonna have some lemonade.

 

Randy

Randy Tyndall - KBOI

ZLA I-11/vACC Portugal P4

“A ship is always safe in the harbor. But that’s not why they build ships” --Michael Bevington ID 814931, Former VATSIM Board of Governors Vice President of Pilot Training

1087023

Link to post
Share on other sites

Randy, you need to sign up as a SUP, you have a lot of experience as a pilot and the right demeanor as well. You can fly while standing by for calls too.

 

Supervisors who are trained to handle issues with pilots who are available is the best solution to most of these complaints. It is a tool we have today and the rules are already in place for them to act in both the members' and VATSIM's best interest. More supervisors signing up means more supervisors available online to provide help within minutes and are able to handle either a pilot who will listen and take some coaching, or not.

 

The need is worldwide, but lucky us, so is the talent.

Kyle Ramsey

 

0

Link to post
Share on other sites

Randy,

 

I must admit that I had to Google NORDO because it doesn't exist in Europe in controlled airspace.

I work in ATC and I can [Mod - Happy Thoughts]ure you that they do not allow a "NORDO" for more then 5min in controlled airspace overhere (I know, nothing to do with Vatsim).

It looks like you fly a lot in the big control area's of the US where controllers have the place to divert other pilot's that take Vatsim on a normal level 90° of track. Again, I have no place to do that. I really try to keep them all separated but sometimes the "good" pilots complain that they are to close to other traffic that just 5min before popped up in the middle of my airspace and not answering to my call's. They than blame me!

If this would happen just once every month I would not have started this topic. I'm not one of those guy's that start complaining without first think and try to solve the problem. This is something that bothers me for a while.

Don't get me wrong: I really like to control on Vatsim and try to keep it "as real as it gets" for the pilot's.

 

Andreas,

On a longer flight I need to eat. And if I need to eat, I will be in my kitchen to prepare fresh food as I never consume junk-food from the freezer or similar, as some here may be doing. Making a nice salad will take more than just 5 minutes...

No problem with that but I can't believe that YOU do that in very busy airspace and during rush hour, 10min before TOD into EDDF, EGLL, EHAM or LFPG.........

 

Erik

spacer.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Erik,

Andreas,
On a longer flight I need to eat. And if I need to eat, I will be in my kitchen to prepare fresh food as I never consume junk-food from the freezer or similar, as some here may be doing. Making a nice salad will take more than just 5 minutes...

No problem with that but I can't believe that YOU do that in very busy airspace and during rush hour, 10min before TOD into EDDF, EGLL, EHAM or LFPG.........

 

Erik

of course I would not, but this is the thing: if I fly online from LOWW to EGCC I am going to p[Mod - Happy Thoughts] through EBBU's airspace. I am at TOC and check Qutescoop: no EDMM, no EDGG, no EBBU online, fine. I will proceed to my kitchen and start making food, which will take about 15 to 20 minutes. In this time I will cross EDMM and EDGG and if they now pop-up and call me without me being responsive, then this is okay, since had checked my airspace ahead and I am okay to step away for up to 30 minutes. If I now took 30 minutes, I'd be in your airspace and only if you were online before I left my computer, I'd have to react to your calls without major delay. These are the two cases that we are trying to cover here. I would like you to see it as well from a pilot's perspective. Yes, there is the odd pilot who climbs out and then goes to his living-room to watch TV. That is NOT what VATSIM is about, not at all.

 

So, again, coming back to your case: you had been online in excess of 30 minutes, so the SUP should have disconnected those pilots within minutes. He probably got distracted by other cases and he forgot to do it. You are always welcome to question our handling of a case if you see a pilot continuing down his route 5 minutes after the SUP has announced to you that he's on the case. We are not perfect and we appreciate little reminders if they are appropriate.

 

Just to be clear: the unresponsive pilots that you mentioned, were they transit flights at FL300 and higher? Or were they approaching their TOD for landing at EHAM/EDDF/EBBR etc.? If they are cruising along, they cannot cause that much concern, at least they do not to me when I control Belgium's airspace as EURM_CTR. Just turn the other guys by 10 degrees and everything looks nice again. I will still go after the unresponsive pilot(s), no question.

 

All I want to say is that we should try and apply common sense. The rules are there:

A. General Rules of Conduct

 

9. When logging on to the VATSIM.net network, a member is not permitted to leave his or her connection unattended for a period in excess of thirty (30) minutes. If a member is unable to comply with this requirement, then he or she must log off of the VATSIM.net network. A member who is found to be unresponsive for more than thirty (30) minutes is subject to immediate removal from the network. Members who are found to repeatedly leave their connections unattended are subject to the terms of Article VI. of the VATSIM.net Code of Regulations.

 

[..]

 

B. Pilot's Conduct

 

3. A pilot must at all times check for appropriate air traffic control coverage for the airspace he is crossing at any given time. If there is an appropriate air traffic controller available or upon request to make contact with an appropriate air traffic controller, then the pilot should immediately contact such controller.

The official way that us SUPs are told to handle those two rules, who seem to contradict each other, are as I have stated above. Common sense.
Link to post
Share on other sites
All I want to say is that we should try and apply common sense.

From both sides......

 

If I would fly from LOWW to EGCC, I'll eat after or before the flight or I fly after diner.

 

Anyway, I'm sure you can see where my frustration comes from.

 

Erik

spacer.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know your frustrations, I share them. And I am trying to explain how these SHOULD be handled by SUPs and members. In ideal world it would not happen, but...

 

And: I need to eat on my way to EGCC, because I want to squeeze a return flight into the evening, no time on the ground. Just like in the real world! Quite often I eat at work like this:

 

Tour%2026APR-01MAY13_024.jpg

 

Unfortunately I do not have a flight attendant at home!

Link to post
Share on other sites
...I can [Mod - Happy Thoughts]ure you that they do not allow a "NORDO" for more then 5min in controlled airspace overhere...

 

Then what? Scramble fighters after five minutes and shoot the poor guy who dialed in the wrong frequency down? They may not "allow it" but I'll bet it still happens, even in real life. The rules may not "allow it", but you as a controller cannot teleport to the silent aircraft and fix his radio or turn it to the correct frequency. While I believe they would scramble fighters to intercept I do not believe their first response would be to shoot the guy down until a definite threat was verified. Until then it is up to the controller on the ground to help all his other aircraft avoid the guy you cannot get to talk to you.

 

...It looks like you fly a lot in the big control area's of the US where controllers have the place to divert other pilot's that take Vatsim on a normal level 90° of track. Again, I have no place to do that.

 

The "infinite" airspace of the Western United States becomes very, very "finite" when two aircraft are in close proximity to each other. And we are not talking "left turn for 180 miles then resume course". 2,000 feet vertically and 1 mile laterally are all you need to avoid a midair collision with confidence. Then you can work on spacing and getting the guy you are in contact with back on course. Again, now you're controlling instead of just watching your scope. I just looked at the EBBU airspace on VATSPY and it is indeed quite small, but surely you have room for that?

 

 

... I really try to keep them all separated but sometimes the "good" pilots complain that they are to close to other traffic that just 5min before popped up in the middle of my airspace and not answering to my call's. They than blame me!

 

You are just doing your job as a VATSIM Controller when you vector aircraft for traffic. Since by this point I'm sure you have contacted a SUP and, whether the SUP was responsive or not, you can suggest to those complaining pilots to do the same. And presentation is everything. Those who have been here a while know that controllers cannot simply "disconnect" a non-responsive "NORDO" pilot. It needs to be a SUP. A simple text "At this point the actions of the NORDO guy are out of my hands, so I'm doing all I can to keep you from hitting him while I contact a SUP. Until then I need you to make an immediate left/right turn to XXX degrees for collision avoidance."

 

If they still blame you what are they going to do? Contact a SUP? That's what you wanted in the first place, let them. Contact your FIR? Great, now you can explain at leisure by email just what your goal in keeping them "safe" was so that next time they understand the need for an immediate turn and all you were doing behind the scenes to resolve the situation for them. "Trash talk" and question your skill? You don't need them in your airspace anyway!

 

It still boils down to "making lemonade".

 

Randy

Randy Tyndall - KBOI

ZLA I-11/vACC Portugal P4

“A ship is always safe in the harbor. But that’s not why they build ships” --Michael Bevington ID 814931, Former VATSIM Board of Governors Vice President of Pilot Training

1087023

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...