Jump to content

(not quite a) Feature request


Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Ross Carlson said:

I'm not understanding your suggestion here. Can you rephrase or elaborate?

Yeah, I am sorry I didn't make myself clear. Let me give you on the example:

You have defined: FIR/ARTCC (let's say NY_CTR), and 2 splits defined (NY_43_CTR, NY_68_CTR).

NY_CTR, NY_1_CTR, NY_W_CTR [...] and so on => Entire ARTCC shows up;
VATSpy detects NY_43_CTR logged in => NY_43_CTR sector shows up.

Mateusz Zymla - 1131338

Operational Officer - ACCPL3

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Mateusz Zymla said:

You have defined: FIR/ARTCC (let's say NY_CTR), and 2 splits defined (NY_43_CTR, NY_68_CTR).

NY_CTR, NY_1_CTR, NY_W_CTR [...] and so on => Entire ARTCC shows up;
VATSpy detects NY_43_CTR logged in => NY_43_CTR sector shows up.

Yeah, that's the fallback mechanism, where it falls back to working the way it does now, if no sector-specific callsign match is found.

Developer: vPilot, VRC, vSTARS, vERAM, VAT-Spy

Senior Controller, Boston Virtual ARTCC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...